Sections 2 (c) (4), 4 and 26 Financial Institutions (Restoration of Financing) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Sections 9 and 7 (4) Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O V11, R 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petitioner's Court, Defective Service / Product Applicant's Return on the Lease Financing Facility was a leased company and the Respondent obtained the financing facility for the purchase of a vehicle by default in payment of installments. Due to this, the applicant restored the vehicle and during that time parts of the vehicle were replaced Respondents filed a case before the consumer court alleging The applicant came to him faulty defective product and service providers have been under the jurisdiction of the court on the issue of the petitioner bank user's application was dismissed. Because the applicant did not assume any obligation to provide direct nexus or leased vehicle connectivity services, the defendant asserted that the applicant, on his own, as a consumer Failure to perform the duty, when he failed to take proper care of the vehicle, on which the applicant had legally reinstated Anupar because some parts were allegedly stolen or stolen. The claim was based on a lease agreement. Among the parties and its action was caused by the applicant's bank's failure to fulfill its obligation to keep the vehicle safe while it was restored. The defendant's case was covered by the Financial Institutions (Security of Finance) Ordinance 2001. , On the basis of which he filed the petition
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
