Article 133 Constitution of Pakistan (Article 1984 Constitution of 1984, 1984), Article 133 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition The pre-privilege witness was the main aspect of the trial at the date, time and place of the trial, the plaintiff (petition) Defendant) Suspends the order of review of the court under which the plaintiff allowed the request for a re-examination of the witness. The plaintiff claimed that the court inadvertently misidentified a witness because of noise in the room court. The statement was recorded, and that the defendant's lawyer was not present at the relevant time to hear and record the evidence of the authenticity presiding officer present in court There's truth to the idea that judicial action was associated with, date, time and place of the important aspects of a premature trial and re-examine the witness will not be limited under any correction. Allowed If a re-examination is allowed, a new Pandora box will open and each party to the pre-emption suite may request a modification of the statement. On the pretext of re-examination / correction, the High Court of Witnesses rejected the order of the reviewing court and the plaintiff's request for a re-examination of the witness was dismissed, in the circumstances, was r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
