Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus ZAFAR IQBAL

Sections 12 and 27 (b) of Conan Shahut (10 of 1984), Article 117, the specific performance suit of the sale contract then proved that the defendant was not aware of such agreement in favor of the burden of proof. Claim to be the right buyer to consider. Such an application applies to the subsequent shopkeeper, who did not say a word in his examination about such request.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA 2012 YLR 2559
• SADIQ SHAH v. GHULAM NABI 2012 YLR 2564
• ARSHAD MASIH v. State 2012 YLR 2568
• MUHAMMAD TUFAIL v. AHMED ALI 2012 YLR 2583
• TAHIRA BIBI v. State 2012 YLR 2607
• NASRULLAH KHAN v. NAZIR BEGUM 2012 YLR 2613
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. State 2012 YLR 2627
• SALEEMA BIBI v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION SHERA KOT, LAHORE 2012 YLR 2631

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

online advocate from Chacklala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes