MANAGING DIRECTOR, MOTELS, PTDC versus PRESIDING OFFICER
Sections 44 (4) (c) (F), 33 (8) and 47 of the Industrial Relations Act (X of 2012) Section 75 Constitution of Pakistan: Article 199 Constitution Petition for the Employee Retention of Retained Employees The Labor Court, a jurisdiction approved by the Court's jurisdiction, directed the employer to issue an order restoring the employee in the light of the decision so as to provide further direction for payment of residual wages. The legal status of a forum should be determined by the status of the employer, if the maximum number of employers was established, then a province was barred from labor court jurisdiction, but the National Industrial Relations Commission had exclusive jurisdiction over industrial relations. The Act, 2012, which was in the field at the time of the approval of the unlawful order, became a fact affidavit to pass an order on a petition filed by the Labor Court. The Labor Relations Act, which had no control over employees in the wake of the Industrial Relations Act, was not authoritative because the 2012 order passed by the Labor Court was not authentic as the agitating person could challenge it in front of other forums. The fundamental rights watchdog High Court had the power to determine the jurisdiction of a forum so that it could proceed on any matter. The matter was not able to sustain the constitutional petition when the aggrieved person had alternative remedies but when the express order was illegal or an unusual decision, then he could not be allowed to go only because the same person challenged. Incomplete injunction was not accompanied by a substitute substitute, category constitutional petition of orders amended under section 47 of the Punjab Industrial Relations Act, 2010
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
