AMIR SHAHZAD CHAUDHARY versus CHAIRMAN, BANK OF PUNJAB
Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Bank Employee Illegal Services Rules Master and Servant, The Applicants' Principal Applicants were Employees of the Bank of Punjab, who had suspended the orders to dismiss them from the High Court. Could not have constitutional jurisdiction. It has been requested that the bank's rules were illegal. The applicants were employees of Bank of Punjab who accepted employment on the basis of service contracts and agreed to govern under the Terms of Service / Human Resource Manual of the Bank, not the Human Resource Manual. Nor did it meet the criteria set out on the subject, which should be interpreted as rules of law The Human Resources Manual was an internal document governing the terms and conditions of bank employees that applicants And any grievance between the banks was governed by the principle of master and servient. Applicants born in violation of their limitations were not appropriate to interfere with the High Court under the legal contract / human resource manual jurisdiction Applicants had full jurisdiction to resolve their complaint with the court of jurisdiction. Can refer to
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
