NASEEM AHMED ANSARI versus HOUSING AND WORKS DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY
A. XXVII, the R1 Contract Act (IX of 1872), a section 2 suit against the Department and its officials, which allegedly was changed during the construction work to recover the money for collection. The oral direction / order of such officers shall not be in accordance with the promise of the Department or the order of the Officers unless the contract is signed in writing with the approval of the competent authority after amending the original contract. Unless directed to increase construction under the control of any Oral Government Officers, it is permissible to do so except in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Contract, the Government shall not be legally obliged to base such oral direction / order record. Pay the suit to the plaintiff on In the case of inheritance, the plaintiff had suits for additional construction work as required by law. The instruction was approved without the approval of the competent authority of such personnel; the plaintiff may claim the appropriate amount from them in their private capacity. Not because the suit was dismissed in his official capacity \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
