Section 5 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XNX of 1965), Section 13 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 contains eleven items on the confession of explosives, unlicensed weapons and evidence of terrorism act. Was captured. Such distinction ensured the recovery of the alleged articles, which was shown to the twelve articles in the FIR, while in the Recovery Memo, it is suspected that the accused's confessional statement after being in police custody for six days. Was recorded. And the suspect was handed over to the investigating officer after recording his confessional statement, both of which were material, because when the confessional statement was recorded and the accused remained in police custody for more than 24 hours, it would not be credible. The matter was not property. There is every possibility that the seals were not the same things that were allegedly recovered on the indictment of the accused; the matter was seen between the statement of the FIR and the prosecution witness when the prosecution case was filled with suspicion. And the trial court failed to review the evidence on record in its original context. The prosecution was not able to prove its case against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt. The hearing decision was set aside and the accused was released.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
