Sections 9, 10, 18, 24 and 32 of the Martyrs (10 of 1984), Arts 16 and 129 (b) evidence of corroborating evidence regarding corruption and corruption practices were not examined in a fair and honest manner. It seemed as if the real players were discharged and the only and only figures that were fully tolerated and the whole exercise seemed to be blindfolding nor the FIR maker. Square has been examined, nothing can be proved against any of the accused. The very first link linking the accused to the crime cannot be proved on the record, which alleged that the person had given his consent, his testimony could not be relied upon, unless he was proved in material details. Not done. The defendant and he described their activity in connection with the preparation of pension documents, being their witness, in some cases there would be no more significant sentence, although the testimony of such witnesses could be recorded, but The rule of wisdom, which was crystallized in the rule of law, was needed, it could not only be the basis of punishment, unless it was endorsed by a free, impartial and impartial ease. No credible evidence was found on the record The dispute can confirm each other, but their testimony is tainted , It cannot be termed as inscrutable in any sense of the word, unless one can provide illusory proof, reinforcing the other. Defective evidence was to be excluded from the evidence, especially when it was deemed to be a law
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
