The claimant's request regarding the limitation of the sale mutation by section 2 (d) and 30 pre-discrimination treaties was banned because the sale was completed before the mutation was validated and its possession under sale. Was a pre-public event. The sale of immovable property will be complete, if the transfer of the property is a consideration, whether it be oral or in accordance with section 30 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Impression Act 1987, Limitations can be through authentication. In the event of a sale not completed by any of the three such methods, the date range of the information in the case of physical sale will be calculated. Variation confirmation is inconsistent with sales completion The sale will not constitute a mutation's ballot verification, proof of sale before confirmation of mutation does not mean that accusation of sale is complete before confirmation of mutation It cannot be proved that the plaintiff did not preside over any particular evidence that he had been physically assaulted on the suit land before such a request was verified. The defendant was repulsed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
