Defendants of the two relief scopes, excluding the techniques, issued the ex-parte order and order, under the IX, Rr 7 and 13 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), declarations of Articles 42 and 54, and a permanent injunction restraining order and decree. The trial court, as well as the lower appellate court, dismissed the petition against the petitioner's order that two reliefs cannot be sought in one application. The application for a justification for setting aside the preceding proceedings / injunction also includes all facts and claims related to the previous proceedings. All the orders related to the ex parte order were merged in the ex parte order, the court was obliged to decide on the matter of merit, rather than dismissing the technicalities only, supporting the ex parte decree petitioner and A recording of conflicting evidence was necessary. The High Court set aside the order passed by the two courts below and after the record of the evidence was sent to the trial court on hearing the decision of the petition, it was allowed to be revised accordingly.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
