The plaintiff's requests for pre-discrimination sections 5 and 15 were that the plaintiff was aware of the suit sale. That he was asked to buy the suit land, but he disagreed with the same purchase, thus, the plaintiff waived his right to a retraction, before seeking a waiver of the right to the lien. For example, a waiver of a legal right will be deliberately waived. Empty, offer should have the effect that the seller wants to sell the suit land. The seller or other person was willing to pay a fixed price and if the pre-emptor wishes to exercise the right in advance, they can buy at the same price, which can be deducted from the discounted prices and the projected conditions. Is offered by the seller or seller. The intention of selling a land to a stranger will not demand a waiver of the authorization before such right, nor can it be construed, nor can it be considered that the plaintiff has knowledge of the sale or offer / The plaintiff's oral statement regarding the refusal to purchase has been apologized. In the absence of proof of the plaintiff's active participation in finalizing the suit land, nothing was available on the suit land record to indicate on whose behalf the offer of purchase was made to the plaintiff. That the seller was unable to discount such reasonable suit at what price the seller was selling the land and how much the value was offered by the claimant circumstances r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
