Find a Lawyer

ALIF KHAN versus HAQ NAWAZ

Section 13 Student Publicity and Student Evidence, Student Media Evidence The performance of a witness was not excluded about the year when the plaintiff was not told about the sale of the case, nor did the plaintiff's statement as requested in the case. Was. The date of writing of the notice of the student and the date of sending the plaintiff in accordance with the statement of the plaintiff and the testimony of the plaintiff was denied by such witness when the plaintiff did not inspect the postman that the plaintiff Failed to prove its delivery to. Prove that both of these Talbot suits were dismissed in the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• Mst. SAHIB JANEY BIBI v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, D.I. KHAN 2012 PLD 35
• ABDUL RASHID KHAN v. State 2012 PLD 39
• MIR TIAZ KHAN v. State 2012 PLD 46
• QAZI LAEEQ v. NAJEEBUR REHMAN 2012 MLD 50
• Haji BHAI KHAN v. SAIFULLAH KHAN 2012 PLD 51
• AYAD ZAMAN v. Mst. SAJIDA 2012 PLD 57
• ABDULLAH JAN v. ZABARDAST KHAN 2012 PLD 63
• IRFAN SAEED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 63

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

online advocate from Poonch lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes