The non-metallic road recorded in the record of the receipt of the copyright in accordance with Section 15 Boundary Act (IX of 1908), Rule 2 (5) and 26, claims that the plaintiffs have a non-metallic road in the record of the revenue. Generally used in full. Term Defendants - Defendant asserts that because the plaintiff owns the land, the plaintiff does not own the plaintiffs. And that the plaintiffs had a 2-foot-wide alternative route from which they used to take their homes on the common road. Accused Swat's customary defendants' plea barred their influence from extending the Convenience Act, 1882 and the Limitation Act, 1908 in the area. Now claim and enforce ease-of-use use on passive land provided that the landowner has the right of office land as a right, without any interruption, and for twenty years without the permission of the owner of the land. Used, according to Shajarah Kishtwar, that the plaintiffs 'land / housing and suite land were interconnected and that the disputed route in the suit area was only a means of access to the plaintiffs' houses. However, in general, humans will generally need a widest route for light vehicles. Particularly in the case of an emergency, the length of the disputed route to their homes was 16 and 37 feet, respectively, which was a motorcar, tractor and one-way. Other light vehicles on the common road and the plaintiffs' houses on record have shown evidence that the plaintiff's servicer owners in the plaintiff's land were never asked for permission to use it by the plaintiffs,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
