FIR's denial that the application for the revocation of the Section 497 (5) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149 murder, assault with a deadly weapon, revealed that someone in this case The accused was also not charged. The complainant, but was involved in the statement of an injured (applicant) in his statement under Sections 161 and 164, the PC injured person did not disclose the source of his information to the accused and the crime was proved. No identification parade was held to perform. There is no direct evidence against the accused and the clear value of the statements of the injured under Sections 161 and 164 was to be seen at the trial by the CR PC, misuse of the exception or tampering with any evidence in the bail. There is no blame on the accused. The accused alleged that the accused's bail was extended because his case is one of inquiry and the trial against the accused was started and the order of passing the bail of the court below was not seen as arbitrary or arbitrary bail. The ry or whimsical request for cancellation was dismissed accordingly
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
