Section 4 and 13 of the Stamp Act (II of 1899), section 2 (5) of the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XXXVII, RR 2, 3 and O VII, R 10, note the defendant for the receipt of money The trial court returned the plaintiff to appear before the competent court of jurisdiction in which it was held that the claimant's note under which the claim was made was not a supporting note, but It was a bond. On the basis of the promissory note that the respondent's claim was payable, the defendant was admitted by the minor witnesses in receipt of the payment of the disputed amount. And said that the document is a note of a document prepared by the plaintiff through the documents based on the plaintiff's signature because it clearly states that the suit will be paid to the plaintiff on his demand and A law has said that the promise cannot be overlooked. The defendant of the bond was obliged to pay according to the contents of the promise caliphate because it was a pro note and not a bond issued by the Bond Judicial and Trial Court, and set aside the case within four. Was sent to the appellate court for. Months
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
