Sections 5 and 7 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Police Order [22 of 2002], Article 18 (4) of defining, convicting evidence for making explosive substances or possessing and possessing unlicensed weapons; The charges against the government were dropped under Section 7 of the Explosives Act 1908, which was not exhibited during the evidence; the accused could not be convicted under Section 5 of the Act, 1908. The head constable, investigating the case, was not able to investigate the matter nor did the bomb disposal unit report report nor any questions related to it. Was raised when its statement under section 342, CRPC was recorded on the accused, under the circumstances, no instability can be made zine with no liability. The bomb disposal unit's report, which contained no legal sanctuary, sentenced the accused on the basis of the recovery in the FIR and the recovery memo, but the allegedly recovered substance was not kept before the accused. While his statement was filed under Section 342, CRPC, his explanation sought the alleged recovery of the person under which the provisions of Article 18 (4) of the Police Order, The case was not implemented in 2002 in which the conviction and punishment imposed under Section 5 of the Explosives Act 1908 were set aside and the accused was convicted. He was acquitted of the charges The culprits were recovered from a prosecution suspect's house in connection with one of his Kalashnikovs. Owned by section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, his conviction and sentence were upheld, under certain conditions of the case.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
