Section 9/4/6570 / Pre Pre-Act, Prevention of Corruption (Second, 1947), Section 5 (2) of offenses by a public servant, banker, merchant or agent. Sorry; the accusation of forging fake documents and corroborative evidence alleges that the document in question was a fake document that was prepared by the accused and replaced with the original file. None of the prosecution's witnesses stated that they were the accused persons who succeeded in replacing the original contentious documents from the files on fake documents. The witness testified in clear and clear terms that, in his report, Did not indicate who was the person responsible for counterfeiting and replacing the original, with controversial documents and his findings were speculative and another opinion could be given regarding the result, the Anti-Corruption Establishment. The entire evidence presented by the defendant was lacking in establishing the accused's involvement in the crime of forgery. Record, even if such documents were presented with evidence in a civil suit, and they faced instability. The NTM documents' litigation record also remained silent as to who and by what authority were the fake anti-corruption documents. Establishments were declared tampered with or no copy was declared in the absence of an original document which documents the trial court's finding of the conviction recorded, properly appreciated the evidence Could not be made on a basis that could not be sustained and could not be sustained The trial court adjourned the trial, set aside, acquitted the accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
