Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 419/420/468/471 Explosives Act (VI of 1908), section 5, fraudulent, fraudulent and dishonest property, forfeiture As a conspiracy, as a genuine use forged document, containing explosives in suspicious circumstances, a bail-out investigation grant was seized by police and allegedly a grenade was also seized from his possession. And she did not even have any documents on the vehicle from which she was driving. While the alleged offenses were guaranteed, while others did not fall under Article 497, the CCPC prosecution did not collect any evidence or material to prove that the accused was required to perform subversive activities or harm his life. There was a grenade for illegal purposes. The property did not bring any expert opinion to the file to show that the hand grenade is in question and could have exploded neither the accused was a former participant In the past the Investigation Officer had no links to the accused. And the investigating officer did not find the suspect's contact with the militants, so the suspect was granted bail.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
