Find a Lawyer

MST. HABIBA BEGUM versus HAJI IQBAL-UD-DIN

AX, R 8 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 181 and 163 Limitation of Termination Scope for Illegal Prosecution The date of dismissal in advance of the plaintiff's presentation was not given by the Presiding Officer but Provided by the reader. The court should not consider the date of the hearing within the meaning of O IX, R 8, in which case the limitation period of the CPC shall be under Article 181 and not in Article 163 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• GULFARAZ v. MUMTAZ 2012 PCrLJ 1743
• NOOR ALI SHAH v. State 2012 MLD 1761
• Dr. ANWAR FARID v. State 2012 YLR 1761
• GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN/FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Deputy Attorney-General of Pakistan, Peshawar v. OBAID KHAN 2012 PCrLJ 1765
• Mst. SHABNAM BIBI v. KHAN BADSHAH 2012 MLD 1795
• ASAL JAN KHAN v. THE STATE through Additional Advocate-General, Bannu 2012 PCrLJ 1797
• MUHAMMAD SHERIN v. State 2012 MLD 1812
• HAIDER KHAN v. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FATA 2012 MLD 1830

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

patent advocate from Pasroor lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes