GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN/FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH DEPUTY ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN, PESHAWAR versus OBAID KHAN
Article 43 and (47 (1) and (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan) Article Special 199 Constitution Constitutional Petition Appeal to the Special Appellate Court Defining the victim affected by the defendant (accused) was his charge. Names and names have bought properties. The drug trafficking trial court seized 40% of the assets in its properties through illegal means, the federal government's appeal filed against it said. That the trial court's decision was dismissed for not maintaining the existing constitutional application was filed by the Anti-Drug Force (Applicant) To set aside the unclean decisions of the trial court and the Special Appellate Court and to order the confiscation of the entire property of the accused under section 47 (1) of the Anti-Smuggling Act 1977, only one special anti-narcotics force Was a prosecutor, was allowed to appear before a special judge, D had no authority to file an appeal or appear in a special appellate court because, according to section 47 (2) of the Trafficking Prevention Act 1977, only one Central Law The law officer appointed under the Officers Ordinance, 1970, was already eligible for action. The Special Appellate Court did not praise the Anti-Narcotics Force, so the improper decision of the Special Appellate Court does not require that the constitutional application for intervention be dismissed,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
