HAIDER KHAN versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FATA
Article 199 The claimants who rejected the lease application for mining lease claim to own the area where the coal mines were located. Authorities leased respondents for a period of 15 years. Which agreement shows that two of the applicants were signatories to the agreement, which would mean that they were barred from their own conduct to challenge the lease agreement if the applicant was \ The owners of the area on the lease in question are upset and are upset over the lease agreement in favor of the respondents. And the matter should have been resolved by a committee formed for that purpose, even if the committee failed to resolve the issue, the applicants would have approached the competent authority who had given the license and should have filed an appeal. , But no such appeal was filed under it. In fact, the issue of the NWFP mining concession rules regarding the dispute in question could not resolve the dispute within the jurisdiction of the High Court writ, which required the recording of evidence \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
