SYED MUSARRAT SHAH versus SYED AHMED SHAH ALIAS LAL BACHA
Section 147 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Parts Affected Privately, The Respondent's Respondents Affirmed That Each Private Owner Has Enjoyed Property According To Its Own Shares Since Private Distribution And Many of these people have separated their shares by name. Of the various people, it was simply not sufficient to establish on the record that there was a private division between the applicant parties and that the defendants were co-owners of the property and that as joint owners they could dispose of their properties. Can sell, buy and sell. The joint estate silently disposed of any request made to the Revenue Officer for the enforcement of an order of the Revenue Officer reflecting the facts of the allegedly private distribution or confirmation of private distribution. And it was a matter of serious nature that in the absence of any non-watt distribution under section 147 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, the mere admission of division of the division could not be sufficient. Is sufficient enough to protect the law, indirect exercise of the jurisdiction of the revenue, in the circumstances, on this subject. N status was no shortage of abuse. And they failed to consider the record in its true context; all the revenue-earning orders were put aside and, in accordance with the provisions of the Western countries, began a new process of strictly partitioning. The matter was forwarded to the Deputy District Officer. Consistent with the Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, to regulate the distribution of common property
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
