Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 365B / 376/494 for abducting, abducting or remarrying with a husband and wife on bail, raping or delaying it. The IR file was refused. The delay was explained in the contents of the FIR for three days but because the complainant was busy searching for his wife / abductor, there were delays in matters which were natural and which had no effect on the prosecution's case. Which was examined under Section 16464, CRPC. It is reported that he was forcibly parked in a car and taken to another city, and later the accused allegedly committed the marriage with him and his alleged abductor also raped the accused. Accused her of having told her ex-Nika's suspect to her husband that the kidnappers had shown that he had accused the accused of forcibly marrying, and that the commission of the rape bill was guilty Which was inherently disgusting. The trial had begun and at this stage it was not appropriate to record the opinion in the case that, under the circumstances, the request for bail was rejected.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
