ZAKIR HUSSAIN ALIAS KAMI versus THE STATE THROUGH A.-G. KPK
Sections 6, 7 and 23 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302, 148/149 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Qatel AMD Constitution Petition for Terrorism Trial from the Anti-Terrorism Court to the Judge in the Court of General Jurisdiction The case is underway. The Anti-Terrorism Court had requested the transfer of the case to the court of general jurisdiction under the provisions of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the accused's plea was rejected by the judge, the Anti-Terrorism Court legal The declaration of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, behind the status and objective, was to provide a faster and faster mechanism for trial of hate crimes for the prevention of terrorism and sectarian violence, the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 To attract, a person had to find a nexus of series of actions in which the accused The dichotomy. Investigation into the alleged criminal act set out in the FIR for alleged terrorism should be examined. Another motivating aspect of the word terrorism in the Act was whether the act created a sense of fear and insecurity in the public or in the public or any section of society if such elements were missing, Then it cannot be bound by its executor. In the present case, the complainant's brother had reported the disappearance of the complainant's son, the matter was investigated and Section 6464 AA / The case was registered under 34, PPC, N, against the accused in the abduction of the complainant's minor son.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
