Sections 302 (b), 324, 337 D&337F (v) / 34 Qutel-e-Aadam, Preliminary Report on Reduction of Sentencing, Jifa, Due to Defamation of Hashima and Joint Intent Evidence The initial report was made by The complainant, who himself was badly injured in the incident and later died. Syed Bian, who had assumed the decree of the deceased, was presented in the presence of the doctor, in whose presence the cause of death was established, which led to the firearms. By not conducting a post-mortem, it had lost its significance and could not be said alone because the defense had failed to break the complainant's position, Saeed's report could not be dismissed by the prosecution's witness The prosecution's testimony is the brother of the deceased, that alone would not be sufficient to refute his statement, otherwise his statement was credible and was not fatal in the case of the prosecution because a witness was unnecessary, while other witnesses In addition to the statements of the complainant, along with the declaration of the complainant's death, other contradictory evidence also dealt with the prosecution. Otherwise, it was the quality of the evidence and not the quantity, even the solely credible testimony of the witnesses, was sufficient to convict the accused. The medical account also supported the prosecution's case as the parties did. The residents of the area and knew each other, they can be easily identified, even in the dark context that having a night without revealing the source of light will create serious suspicion on the suspect's identity. I had 2 45 hours of stress
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
