A IX, R 13 General Clause Act (X of 1897) Section 27, the former order, for the purpose of putting aside the meaning suit, the appellate court declared the former person guilty of the offense against the defendant and his salary was followed. Was involved in the import process. Rejecting the previous order, on the basis that the defendant was presented by publication in the newspaper and by the registered post, nothing from the record showed that the registered service card issued to the defendant was his Was returned with any report. The defendant and the newspaper service was an English daily newspaper with no widespread circulation in the area, meaning the proper purpose of use in O IX, R 13 of the CPC, was sufficiently or largely unnecessary to respond to that goal. It may be necessary for the court to keep in mind the issue of fair justice with all the parties involved, deciding whether there is a good cause or not, and that the technical law should provide the court with concrete justice and There should be no stopping illegal acts based on the decision that comes before it. Under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, it was held that the addressee had received the registered letter. The post but said that the idea would be compounded by the fact that if the same came back with the postal validation which the respondent had refused to perform at the same defendant's place at the relevant time and the plaintiff. I find that the plaintiff in the village was not personally present and was discriminated against by the defendant through non-injunction orders under which the High Court allowed the review of the former party decree.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
