Articles 2 & 2 and 1 561A Law in the Testimony (of 1984 of the), Article ?????? Authorized to examine the scope and principles of the 43 accused Observations made by the trial court against the police officer on the statements of the accused persons. Was filed under Section 2342, CR PC. During the trial, and in response to a question, all the defendants responded in a way that stated that their vehicle was issued by the accused police officer (applicant) against the receipt of illegal securities. , And on the basis of such response, the trial court directed the registration under Section 342 (3), CCP, of a separate case against the accused police officer, indicating that the defendant's responses were Can be brought against, but there was nothing in the above section which would indicate that there was any response by the accused. It can be used against a co-accused or any other person, the statement of the accused under section 342, CR PC, was neither confession nor equivalent to confession. I can be taken to explain the evidence presented against me by the accused, the Criminal Code of Conduct, 1898, it was not a law at all, it was a regulatory law and only the law's testimony order, 1984 was the relevant concrete law. , Which determined the legal value and admissibility of any evidence or statement, therefore, during their scrutiny under Section 342, CR PC, The defendant's answer, the confession did not fall within the scope of the crime, as it was not recorded in accordance with the law prescribed by him, the reply by the accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
