Sections 302 (b), 324, 148 and 149 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 assassination testimony, testimony of two witnesses to the assassination attempt of the Qatal Ummah, rioting and unlicensed weapons. In connection with the indictment against an accused who was not encouraged, the trust belonged to the party involved in the false allegations, which was denied, was not presented, and did not present any evidence in a set of witnesses. Who had caused non-presentation. The non-appearance of the injured witness did serious damage to the prosecution's case; the three women, according to the prosecution, were also eyewitnesses to the incident and the identity of the accused was not presented as evidence, the aforementioned witnesses will be present. Assuming in favor of the accused, dealing immediately with the complainant before the tragic event was contrary to the natural course of human behavior. R and a close relative were in shock and injuries, but he did not receive any treatment, six gunmen were automatically fired at the complaining party and targeted. And three people were killed, one wounded and two eyewitnesses, who were nearby, not harmed. He did not argue that the assailants, who knew that the complaining party would be injured and left the complainant, who was not only an eyewitness to the crime, but also the son of the victim in the investigation. That is, the required motivation as presented by the prosecution did not prove through the prosecution that when the ocular testimony was not considered sufficiently competent, then the evidence to prove
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
