O XX, R 18 (2), O XXI, Rr 1, 2 & 23 A case for possession by division should be excluded from the appeal filed against the preliminary injunction by the trial court to exclude the plaintiff's request. Appears for a Final Order Approval through Hearing. On the basis that the parties had settled outside the court through the intervention of the locals' elders after the appeal was dismissed, the plaintiff had found his fair share in the disputed house, the trial and the appellate court thus Denied the plaintiff's request for refusal to accept the 's agreement. Several location signatures and thumbprints were required to allow the parties to guide supportive and contradictory evidence to bring the court to justice. The trial court committed an irregularity by not giving the defendant an opportunity so that the court could prove such an agreement. In order to secure the pursuit of justice only and in the event of irrelevant objection / defense cooperation, uld charge the expense for all courts to decide a dispute between the parties or in compliance with the decree in case of failure of their objection. The High Court set aside the unspecified orders and allowed the plaintiff to present positive evidence within one month after promising the trial court that in the event of its failure to do so , It will have to pay a sum of Rs. 1,100 and hold 1 share share in the disputed house without any loss. will have to take over.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
