Further investigation into the death of a firing at a wedding ceremony revealed that the accused, the accused and the complainant (subd. Brother of several others were present at the marriage ceremony with several others, the complainant alleged that the accused fired three consecutive bullets, but the complainant did not raise any motive for the crime. The accused had no motive or intention of killing the victim and failed to prove the prosecution in his statement under Section 164, CRPC. An enemy of the accused to the witness provided details of the case were different from the construction tar prescription, which went as was listed on the information presented by the accidental result. In the death of the deceased and none other than your witness, the prosecution's other witnesses, including the deceased's heirs, did not charge the accused with prayer. The accused will be convicted under section 2302 or 2 332, PPC or he was guilty under section 191919, PPC, to be determined after the conclusion of the trial, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case. 1919, a person may be charged under PPC, which is a guaranteed offense. It was there to believe that further investigation was needed for the crime of the accused. The accused's request for bail was allowed and he was released on bail.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
