Section (c) and nar 48 Determinants of the possession of narcotics Definition of two versions The jurisdiction of the jurisdiction to argue that he had a financial dispute with a person in the vehicle and that the design was illegal. The man, who was pending a drug case and with whom the Anti-Narcotic Force staff joined hands, confessed in his statements to two witnesses in the lawsuit that the vehicle's suspect was the driver's personal There was no recovery from the seizure from which the drugs were recovered, there was also evidence to be released with the question in the vehicle. Not to prove that the suspect was either the owner of the vehicle or the drug was recovered from his personal possession, the suspect had some financial conflict with one of the arrested persons in the vehicle, even before a drug case. The driver of the vehicle was released by the prosecution, which was not known, but the driver product said that the police presence attendance mat was handed over to the court by the police, which made it clear He was appropriately present in his home and was the original witness of the irreparable Syed Driver Prosecution but for no credible reason Er was not brought to trial. , And instead was presented by defense and in his statement broke the prosecution's story. There was no evidence that the accused had previously been involved or convicted in similar cases and his mere presence in the relevant time would not be enough. There were two versions of her condemnation case for her alleged crime. One prosecutor and the other accused, and wherever
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
