M.S. QURESHI FLOUR MILLS THROUGH SHEHZAD QURESHI versus REGIONAL MANAGER, UTILITY STORE CORPORATION, PESHAWAR
Article 36, O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2, O XL R 1 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for Interim Interim Order Processing, When the Central Case Temporarily Discharges Order and Eliminates Scope for Recipient Appointment If rejected, the applicant was of the view that the main scope was dismissed as soon as it was withdrawn, therefore, the interim order was temporarily dismissed and the application for appointment of the recipient was processed under the law. Cannot, and pray that the respondent's request under Section 36, CPC for the execution of the said order be dismissed. The record revealed that the applicant's request for a temporary injunction and appointment of the recipient was rejected. The order to reject the petitioner's prayer was not executed in any way as no order was sanctioned pursuant to section 36 of the CPC even if it was deemed there was such a viable order. , Then stood the same which merged with the Central Order, under which the suit was dismissed after the withdrawal of the applicant. In the case no enforceable order was passed, the orders of the courts below were without jurisdiction and legal authority and they were allowed constitutional application, accordingly.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
