Section 409 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 221 and 342 of criminal trust by public servants or bankers, merchants or agents, evidence Abuse of Appreciation Forest trees have not initiated any action against two designated officers / employees of the District Forest Officer by the Forest Department Department. Failed to provide any explanation for the testimony, the testimony presented to the defendant as one of the co-accused The witness was not an independent witness, Sayed said instead of the witness / co-accused, it was alleged that a report of ge damage was prepared against the suspect who raised doubts about the authenticity of the charges. No evidence was brought to the record. The accused had allegedly abused 35 trees. The Investigating Officer has not inspected the site nor recorded any other incident except the SS. The persons mentioned in the inquiry report have not been charged in connection with the charge of tearing the book of No Damage, The recording of the evidence in this regard would be a reversal in the eyes of the law; under Section 221, the PC charge was mandatory. The accused accused of destroying the "book of damages" by the exact organizers of the specific charges. Or was not accused of being a fugitive while recording his statement under Section 2342, CRPC, against any A piece of evidence cannot be used. The accused does not justify the trial court in convicting the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
