Under the QQ Law of Evidence (10 (1984 of 10)), the applicable legacy principle was adopted by the plaintiffs on 7 7 19 1925 in the legacy certified by the plaintiffs on their request that they The two courts, together with the judiciary, made decisions together with both the courts, in 1915, the two courts were upset with the decisions made under the mutation, when too much water flowed under the bridge. On leaving, the plaintiff withdrew from his statement and was treated for filing and claiming the case. That it was not in his interests that the foregoing challenged this change when he knew full well about the prosecution and participated in the proceedings in the High Court of Stability for the consolidation of the amended jurisdiction. Done - circumstances below, dismissing the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff in review
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
