Section 302 (b) Qatil-ud-Aid evidence was immediately recorded in the benefit of the doubt, the accused was not declared to be the cause of any specific firearm on the victim, and the role of the accused was the same as that of the acquittal. The co-accused has no problem. Medical evidence was available to the prosecution to the extent of the role allegedly played by the accused, and to the extent of the alleged ocular account presented by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness in the collar account, there is no coordination by that purpose. Millie, reportedly could not get any help from the recovery. According to the report and report of the suspect in the forensic science laboratory, if the medical evidence of the gun, the evidence of the intent and the recovery was excluded from consideration, then there was no other evidence that the account presented by the complainant and the prosecution witness Can provide any assistance / assistance to the account. If the capital charge fails the prosecution, the defendant's conviction and conviction for a trial trial to maintain the conviction prove to be the case for any suspect, accused and accused of any trial.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
