ITTEFAQ FOUNDRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW, ISLAMABAD
Section 284 (2) of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 62 of the National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 5 (r) and of the 18 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Referring to the nomination of the candidates Benefits of Assistance Financial institutions were sued by applicants for a pre-determined PLAY claim by the National Accountability Bureau that there was a dire need for an agreement between the parties and no one was against them. The money was not owed on the part of the parties to the mutual agreement later on was the elite of the applicants and lending banks and Once among the eight bodies were nubt real deal real deal, then right and responsibilities were extinguished and he was replaced by nuuaytyd rights and obligations under the contract. In fact, the termination of the contract created a new contractual obligation and change of terms. Of the original contract, therefore, if there was any D's superiority, either deliberately or deliberately, it was extinguished by an agreement between the parties that came to the trial of the High Court in the civil suit, since the parties were already authorized. The court was already subject to adjournment between the parties before the law. Or the National Accountability Bureau or the National Accountability Bureau because of the financial institution's action against the applicants under the National Accountability Ordinance, PPPP applicants paid all outstanding money to the lenders with markup And the authorities had no objection to filing a reference to prevent the situation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
