Find a Lawyer

SHAFI MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Modification or Revision Scope of the 366 Decision \ Change \ Or Review Review Section 36969 draws attention to any court, including the High Court, in its decision to change or modify its criminal original jurisdiction in Section 696969, CR PC. Apply the principle, which was intended to change the order of appeal or rejection. Decisions included in the reduction or enhancement of the revised sentence that sought to be reviewed did not qualify as a final decision, which was repealed in section 696969 as the word \ verdict, c. The RPC will include any order. Will try to resolve the matter eventually \ \ r \ n

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012

• Syed SAEED REHMAN v. MUHAMMAD AZHAR JAMAL 2012 PLD 151
• MURAD BUKHSH v. State 2012 YLR 153
• Haji ABDUL MATEEN AKHUNDZADA v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, QUETTA 2012 PLD 154
• SHER AHMED v. KHUDA-E-RAHIM 2012 MLD 158
• FAIZ MUHAMMAD JAFFAR v. THE STATE through NAB, Quetta 2012 PLD 164
• STUDENTS OF GOVERNMENT GIRLS COLLEGE, KUCHLAK v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Education, Quetta 2012 CLC 168
• NOORULLAH v. State 2012 YLR 168
• Haji ALLAH NAZAR v. SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT-II, QUETTA 2012 PCrLJ 178

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2012 →

property advocates from Baroute lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes