Section 9 (c) confirms the value of drug trafficking evidence while traveling in the truck, the accused was found in drug possession, the prosecution proved by providing cautious and solid evidence that the witness statements indicated a clear contradiction. Cannot be born with. Over time, easily overlooked, and despite thorough scrutiny, nothing beneficial can be extracted, providing assistance in the defendant's case, all of the prosecution's witnesses were natural and neutral, with no enmity against the accused or There was no problem. And their evidence could not be excluded simply because they were official witnesses, there would be no question of alternatives or false opportunities for the accused to be found in drug possession, the trial court argued. And for good reason. The closing verdict was not subject to any illegal acts or material irregularities, there was no delay in filing the FIR of Section 103, there was no application on CCP drug cases because under the Drugs Act 1997 In accordance with the provisions of Out of concern, all four included in the questions were recovered from the truck's secret cavities, driven by the suspect, segregated from each packet in a certain quantity of marijuana, sealed in a separate parcel, and analyzed by the federal government for polling. The positive events that led to the car being partially confessed by the defendant and the raising of the alternative and F's request meant that the claim was nothing but the strange facts and circumstances of the case. Only his own defense version is false, fabricated and later
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
