Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) Qatiel Am, conviction for complimentary testimony of the joint intention, after passing through the evidence at the trial, concluded that the prosecution presented its evidence against the accused. The Ocular Account, in particular, has been presented by the prosecutor's witness, who last saw the accused in the companion's cell that his innocence had failed to provide sufficient explanation, from an independent witness There was no molestation or misconduct involved in the commission of the crime, especially when the accused was the real father of the victim, the witness was subjected to a lengthy investigation. The novel was done, but the defense failed to shake its authenticity, the defense lawyer was not in a position to defend the defendant's case, as identified by the defense lawyer in the statement of the prosecution's witnesses. Of great importance was the contradiction of the plaintiff, which was to some extent related to the exemption of the case whose trial proved beyond any doubt, the trial court granted the accused under section 3030 Sentenced to death (b), the PPC held that the provisions of the law provided for two types of punishment, as a matter of effectiveness and the sentence of death sentence or life sentence imposed by the court on the life and liberty of the people. Demands the utmost care to cope. And that the defendants were also entitled to dismiss the benefit of the doubt on the question of conviction, some of the mitigating circumstances available on the file of the case, avoiding the trial court's notice of the amount of the sentence, were, according to the prosecutor's own interests, The incident was caused by the victim because he and the accused
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
