MST. FAIQA ABDUL HAYEE versus CHAIRMAN, BALOCHISTAN BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, QUETTA
Article 120 suit was simultaneously dismissed for a declaration seeking a correction of birthdate on the Second 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the Secondary School Certificate, and the Historical Board of Secondary Education Boundary Record, which the plaintiff claims was his His parents' statements are authentic. The plaintiff and his parents did not provide any explanation as to why he or she was in the know about his wrong birth registration or why his parents did it and he was 23 years old. Remained silent for He did not present the diaries he had alleged that he was the source of his knowledge of the correct date of birth, and that the courts of the lower courts had to restrict the statements of parents. The matter was accurately estimated by IS, although it was the basic and best evidence of history. Births, but not solely relying on parental assertions, need to be harmonized with the facts with such statements and the Independent Evidence Municipal Corporation's Birth Register, or any quote from Form B of the Data Registration Authority. No such relief could be claimed on anonymous evidence, in which case, the review was excluded.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
