DR. MUHAMMAD AZAM KASI versus THE STATE THROUGH DEPUTY PROSECUTOR-GENERAL ACCOUNTABILITY COURT NO.1, NAB, QUETTA
Article 12 and 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 23 Right to Property Freezing of Property (Bank Accounts) Confirmation of Freeze Duration The former terms and conditions were filed before the Accountability Court for non-submission of reference and the complaint was that His accounts could not be frozen. The order to freeze the accuracy for an unlimited period and the validation period was limited by the law for a reasonable time, therefore, no property should be ordered to be frozen for an indefinite period. The purpose of the petition to confirm the order was to secure immovable property. The property, based on all possible evidence and material collected by the investigating officer, during the period of fifteen days provided by the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 against the NAB accused, before the decision of the reference by the trial court chairman. Could have approved the freezing order. Prepare the reference and send it to court along with the request for confirmation. Such request was made by the prosecution, without any reference, which was not sure when the reference would be presented, through trial court. The order issued, without reference, was considered for an unlimited period and was against not only the law's profits but also the provisions of Article 23 of the Constitution, the first condition for the confirmation of the frozen order was that There seems to be a reasonable basis for believing that the accused has committed such a crime and to believe that a person has committed a crime. . When no reference was filed before the trial court, the trial court affirmed the frozen order
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
