Offer and Section 6 (2) (g) Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) Convicted of drunkard terrorism Any crime of the Anti-Terrorism Court of Sihkadri, where the perpetrator is not allowed And the perpetrator will be punished. This crime falls within the purview of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the occurrence of a crime commission, its occurrence, its purpose and the fact that it was not just that the public witnessed widespread crime or no. Determining the deciding factors of the issue, whether a case falls within the parameters of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, will be the key question as to whether the crime has the effect of targeting terrorism, or And creating a sense of insecurity? People or any section of the public, in the present case, had committed the murder of three innocent people on false charges of monopoly, while taking the law into their own hands, such a move would certainly create a sense of fear, villagers. No one can be licensed to terrorize and terrorize the land in their hands and begin to execute the criminals themselves, rather than prosecuting gurus-based murder. ? Under Section 6 (2) (g) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the killing of innocent people, especially women, was un-Islamic, illegal and unconstitutional in any case. Who would take the law into his own hands, to appease his cruelty or his cruelty, was responsible for creating sensation and panic in society;
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
