In section 2 (2 (b) and 324 Qatil Adham), the admission of testimony of the defendant was not the witness father of the injured eye and the complainant was the real brother of the victim. The witnesses cannot be left aside for their statements, nor can they be called interested witnesses, since their accused did not directly object to the defense, despite long cross-examination, Failure to make any error in the truth of the matter, except for some contradictions, which were useless and not fatal to their evidence, were the same village residents And because of the close relationship with the deceased, their presence could not have been seriously threatened, there was no possibility of daylighting, evidence of false identification, evidence of a material contradiction, Contradiction or natural weakness was not encountered, but was consistent with other evidence consistent with material possibilities, particularly supporting the positive report of rifle recovery and firearm specialist fact from the suspect's possession. The help that the FIR was promptly filed, in which the accused was named, shows that the complainant was not. Separately stated the facts. Incident evidence, such as inquiry report site inspection memo and site sketch preparation / endorsement; recovery of vacancies; blood and stained land and clothing specialist report as well as FIR The life of an innocent person has been taken away, an old man has received firearms, there is no situation for him to be reduced.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
