Appreciating the evidence for Section 9 (C) drug possession and trafficking, the accused was arrested on the spot while sitting in the car's driving seat, of which 40kg of hashish section 103 was recovered, CCP Not Applicable Drug cases, non-participation of private witnesses in the recovery process did not affect the trial The police witnesses were good witnesses like any other citizen unless there was any dishonesty against them. The police officers presented a straightforward and confident inspiring account, which was not encountered. No contradictions, contradictions or natural weakness records show that the prosecution's witnesses against the accused were acquitted on malicious charges, the accused confessed to his presence in the car, drug samples recovered from the car The analysis found the hash, which was in the possession of the car, and if the accused was taken into custody, it would be considered drug possession and conscious possession. There was nothing to request from the defense but the story of a hen and a bull The version was more insignificant and closer than the defense version, the controversial decision was based on valid reasons and was neither misleading nor It was a delinquent offense and the conviction of the accused was maintained in the cases
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
