Section 302 (b) The testimony of Qatil-Umid's testimony The benefit of the doubt Ocular account, which was neither straightforward ward nor trustworthy, remained unadulterated All the alleged eyewitnesses were closely related to each other and were not trusted by the accused. To maintain, the conviction on the criminal charges should be proved, the evidence should come from independent and unreliable sources, without any fraudulent and unrealistic witnesses, the punishment convicted of the accused can hardly be retained in the law because the alleged witnesses Failed to impress confidence, the victim, though not enough to disprove their evidence But, as a precaution, the court had to find a freely agreed marital dispute regarding the marriage of the deceased accused's divorced wife; the parties were present, thus finding a liar was not possible. No weapons were recovered. The suspect's involvement in the crime of supporting the ocular account was highly suspicious, in which case the injuries listed in the Medico Legal Certificate indicate he would show up and suggest that According to the prosecution's testimony, the crime was not committed in the same manner. The co-accused was arrested from the scene of the crime. Immediately after the incident, a 30 bore pistol was recovered from his possession, the same weapon was fired from three vacant sites collected from the scene of the incident. Was recovered from the possession of. The only independent witness of the incident, which was sufficient to raise suspicion regarding the involvement of the accused in the alleged crime, did not say anything about the presence of another accused, who
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
