Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd Apprecia tion Benefits of Doubts of Evidence There was no solid evidence available to support the charges against the accused persons, linking them to the commission of the crime. Included was a close relationship between the witnesses and the deceased, although their evidence was not sufficient to corroborate, but it should be natural, confident and supported by independent pieces of evidence. At the time of the incident, he had failed to establish his presence beyond reasonable doubt. His claim that the presence or presence of the victim's house on the night of the incident was not only a lengthy claim, but enough to raise serious doubts about his fact, the other two witnesses were not eyewitnesses to the incident. Was planted. Earlier, it was known as witnesses that the trial on the murder was fabricated evidence in which the accused disclosed his identity to the prosecution itself. Witnesses denied the presence of any of the witnesses when the FIR was filed after an unspecified interval of 4/5 hours, in which names of witnesses could not be found indicating the accused's false involvement and falsehood. The possibility of storytelling was not affected by the occupation of the culprits; there was no report of a ballistic expert capable of giving a credible account to the prosecutor, without any credible, credible or unrecognizable evidence or in any way. Failure to bring the circumstances of the case, only one version can be estimated to link the accused in the case to the crime. Is a. A midnight call was made, absent prosecution of the accused
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
