THE STATE THROUGH ADDITIONAL PROSECUTOR-GENERAL versus NAWABZADA SHAH ZAIN BUGTI
Section 353/109/186 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance Tx X 1965), Section 13 (d) / 16/20 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 103 assault or criminal force Recovery articles from public servants to stop their duties, interruption of public works, obstruction of public servants, acts of terrorism, possessing illegal weapons, deliberate purchase of unlicensed weapons, etc. to prevent Allows the preparation of the Frontier Corps and the police work jointly. Heavy weapons and ammunition allegedly recovered from the accused (defendants) The trial court did not allow the prosecutor to present the weapons, ammunition and vehicles on the basis that the record did not reveal the facts. Whether the articles were taken into custody by police authorities. Even if a seizure memo was created on the site. Whether the recovered articles were declared a case property, and whether the requirements of Section 103, CR P 0 were legally complied with by the FIR, revealed that the Frontier Corps and the police jointly acted jointly. What is it. The Frontier Corps physically seized the recovered articles, but because they were so large, only a list of the said articles was handed over to the police, indicating that the Frontier Corps retained the physical custody of the recovered articles. The situation has made it limitless. Whether the physical possession of the recovered weapons, ammunition and vehicles was either with the Frontier Corps or with the police, it was said that after being part of the evidence and material collected during the investigation, the court
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
