Sections 302 (b), 324/34, 337f (ii) and 337e (ii) attempt to compel Qutel-Amad, Qutel-um, which led to the appreciation of demi-martyrdom, praying for his release from punishment Instead, the defendant's lawyer, seeking to reduce the release of the accused's lawyer, was trying to end the death sentence on life imprisonment charges. The complainant and the injured witness were eye-witnesses to the incident, who provided clear and convincing evidence, and despite lengthy inspections, the defense failed to obstruct. In his case, except for some of the privileges which were illogical and not fatal to his evidence, Syed's witness was accompanied by the deceased at the time of the incident and, being a resident of the area, on his presence at the relevant time. No seriousness could be doubted. The incident occurred in broad daylight, in which case there can be no question of misidentification. Air contradiction, contradictory or inherently weak and likely, was materially compatible with other evidence, especially the medical evidence complainant and other witnesses to the prosecution although the defendant's real brother, but only on the basis of the relationship, Cannot make conclusions. As an interesting witness, since there was no direct enmity with his accused, who was designated in the FIR with a specific firing character even otherwise, such witnesses could not be expected. That they make the actual culprits free and alternate criminals in such crimes. The crime, because it was a rare occurrence to replace him, after the crime was proved, he escaped and escaped the law, sufficient to convict the accused himself.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
