Disqualification by Section 497 Expeditionary Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392/395/397 Dacoity, Dacoity Bail, Grant of bail granted to the accused by the Sessions Judge, Additional Sessions Judge by the Additional Sessions Judge (trial court). The given observations were called back. The verdict was completely based on misinterpretation and misinformation of the evidence on the record as well as the offense was not committed by the high courts against the accused, however, the sessions judge delayed the filing of the case by three days. The accused was granted bail. The CRC session session judge had considered a compromise between the parties, but the CR session complained that the matter did not fall within the prohibited clause of section 497 (1). Due to the ability to issue notices to the parties at any stage of the trial, it is undoubtedly the competence at any stage of the trial. The circumstances and circumstances of the case, but not the way it was done in the present case, the prosecutor should have presented evidence against the accused and not the trial court, therefore, his jurisdiction under the law is valid. Was not used on. The sessions judge rightly granted the accused's bail and his termination by the Additional Sessions Judge was illegal, without any jurisdiction and no guarantee under the law, therefore, the controversial order was set aside and Accordingly, the accused was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
