HAJI TOR KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, QUETTA
Clauses 8, 42 and 54 for the defendant, property, declaration and injunction claiming to be the owner of the plaintiffs 'land claimed that the defendants' possession of the said land was unauthorized and illegal and the revenue in favor of the plaintiff. Entry to the record didn't exist. The suit in the name of the plaintiff was denied by one of the parties, which initially proved to be the case for the plaintiff and the burden, therefore, the plaintiffs have a legal title in relation to the land in their favor. To establish the existence of The plaintiff asserted their rights in relation to the land, claiming that they had purchased the land from their owners and that they were seizing the accused in defense of their rights. The bar had to establish a legal transaction between them. The question to prove himself and the better owners of the land in which the defendant allegedly purchased the suit land, the defendant said, had not recorded any title in favor of the shopkeepers. The vendors were recorded in the Revenue Record, but the defendants failed to present any entries made in favor of the seller's contracts. Defendants were less supportive of them, no other title was presented by the defendants, which could prove that they have a title in relation to the suit land, which is legally based on the sale transaction. But as regards the defendants' possession of the land, the title of the defendant may not prove the existence of a legal title in their favor.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
